We recently received a tip from someone who claims to work internally at T-Mobile. The information in the tip has just confirmed everything we have ever thought about Samsung, OTA’s and new devices.
Our source has confirmed that there is already a fully functioning 2.2 OTA update ready to be pushed out by T-Mobile but Samsung has told them NOT to release the update for fear of it decreasing the value of the newly announced Vibrant 4G+. Further information has revealed that not only is the Samsung Vibrant 4G nothing more than a Vibrant with a front facing camera (FFC), but the software update would also enable the same 4G speeds that we are already capable of. The only thing missing at this point is a nice little 4G icon on your screen, which is in the update as well. This is questionable as the hardware needs to support HSDPA+ for this to work, but you never know.
Quote from our Tipster:
Some disturbing things have happened the last week or so concerning our “Vibrant”. Samsung has NOT allowed us to push the update OTA for 2.2 because they feel it will decrease the value of the upcoming Vibrant4G +. While from a marketing aspect i totally understand, as the Vibrant 4G is what the original Vibrant should have been in the 1st place. But to shun off and bold face lie to customers is NOT what T-Mobile is about.
…Being that, Vibrant 4G and Vibrant have exactly same stats, added FFC and a new movie and the 4G. But i will tell you this, the original vibrant CAN utilize 4G FULLY. Yes FULLY. not what they are telling you.
This recent information just solidifies our previous thoughts about the the recent device announcement. It’s nothing more then what we already have with the addition of a FFC. News like this also makes me shift more of my frustrations away from T-Mobile and more toward the manufacturers making life extremely difficult.
So what is Samsung doing? I’m not really sure at this point. Everything points to the company being dead set on sales numbers instead of keeping the people that have made them millions happy. If this is Samsung’s business model it sure is not going to keep them in the front running for very long.
We have contacted Samsung and are currently waiting for them to respond.
UPDATE: The source of this information contacted us once more with a little update about the 4G performance he mentioned. This is what he said:
We have already put it out there that most of out devices would see a speed boost with the new network. Just the Vibrant will see a bit more. So I dont see why that is such a huge surprise to your readers. But not full 4G.
So as you can read, it’s not going to be full 4G compatibility, but he does say that the Vibrant will get a bigger advantage from the upgrade than other phones on the network. I think we’d all like to see any increase in speed no matter how small it is.
We cannot validate nor deny this speculation at this time, however we are just relaying the information provided to us.
Share This Article....
If you like that, Try these....
![[Video] Samsung “el Plato Supreme” teaser featuring Seth Rogan and Paul Rudd](http://androidspin.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Samsung-TheNextBigThing-150x150.png)
![[Video] Galaxy S IV and Unpacked Event Return in Teaser Part 2](http://androidspin.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Galaxy-s4-teaser-part-2-150x150.jpg)
About the Author
Why is this not at all surprising news?
Really now? What the heck! I feel like I have given them a chance but if this turns out to be true that is extremely frustrating!
I don’t think this is true at all. It’s one thing to hold back the Vibrant, but Nexus S doesn’t support HSPA+ either, so I think the support isn’t in the hardware.
the supoort is in the hardware – there are a half dozen leaked Froyo builds for the Vibrant easily available.
The support for froyo is there..not for 4g…even getting the ffc working with the existing hardware has been a pain for some of the best devs out there
I’m skeptical about this part also. But you never know.
Agreed…this does not sound right…we have to wait for official announcements rather than relying on this so called leaked info…
The hardware isn’t there and the vibrant 4g isn’t what the vibrant was supposed to be..thvibrantt IS what it was supposed to be…have all these rumors made everyone forget what this phone is capable of??? Granted its the community that released its full potential…but don’t forget that samsung didn’t lock it down…where as the g2 by htc was!!! Wait and see before jumping to conclusions
Samsung Troll
And thats why Samsux!!
Breaking news! Manufacturers care only about the current quarter’s bottom line! Filmateleven.
Seriously though, was there ever any questions on who is holding up the firmware upgrades on phones? This is exactly why I refuse to buy hardware that is locked down.
What kind of pucky bullsnot is this mularkey. I have just as everyone else been waiting for 2.2 for my Vibrant. If it wasn’t for my Droid work phone it would have been rooted or booted. And BTW….we can actually buy the camera and install it ourselves ! Thanks Samsung…………..Bastards
What kind of pucky bullsnot is this mularkey. I have just as everyone else been waiting for 2.2 for my Vibrant. If it wasn’t for my Droid work phone it would have been rooted or booted. And BTW….we can actually buy the camera and install it ourselves ! Thanks Samsung…………..Bastards
T-Mobile needs to reverse the anger and tell Samsung NO NEW CRAP UNTIL YOU UPDATE WHAT WE HAVE!
And samsung will say ok im sure AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and other sub cariers will buy our phones.
They already do…
and they will do the same to their other customers and eventually people will see how samsung truly treats their customers
T-Mobile needs to reverse the anger and tell Samsung NO NEW CRAP UNTIL YOU UPDATE WHAT WE HAVE!
I knew it! Something just didn’t smell right and that is the marketing/sales department of samsung. I hate you sammy, I really hate you!
Well, this doesn’t surprise me after the scandal of Lee Kun-hee Samsung’s CEO and just how the company operates in general. They are in the market of SELLING their phones and that’s about it. They don’t care much about their customers.
Instead of just complaining do something.
I’m sure if just 1% 10 million Galaxy phone owners emailed, called, blogged to voice their disapproval Samsung will bow down to it because like all Asian culture it is about not losing face and when you put that to the public if forces their hand.
Time for T-Mobile to man up and push the OTA regardless of what Samsung says. If they do, it will show that they care about their customers and it will show Samsung that these sorts of shenanigans aren’t tolerated.
And if something goes wrong and Samsung doesn’t support it due to premature release?
Samsung you morons, you have already lost a mill+ customers in the US.
If they have the OTA ready to push, then JL5 is the OTA.
I leaked this almost 3 weeks ago. Go enjoy it.
STOCK ODIN .tar and rooted ODEX/DEODEX versions are posted on XDA.
If that is true….then why doesn’t JL5 show/indicate HSPDA+???
I don’t think JL5 is the final product….but very close to it. I think if and when they ever release 2.2 OTA, there will be some code changes.
the only difference between the two radios is the ogvibrant uses 16qam were the new vib uses 64qam 64qam could be achived if you combine qpsk and 16qam at the same time(dual band). it is possible the vibrant already could do this and is disabled by modem file. too bad no one has vibrant modem source
And JL5 doesn’t provide 4G support.
If they have the OTA ready to push, then JL5 is the OTA.
I leaked this almost 3 weeks ago. Go enjoy it.
STOCK ODIN .tar and rooted ODEX/DEODEX versions are posted on XDA.
If they have the OTA ready to push, then JL5 is the OTA.
I leaked this almost 3 weeks ago. Go enjoy it.
STOCK ODIN .tar and rooted ODEX/DEODEX versions are posted on XDA.
The fact that this source is saying its samsung doing this and this is not what t-mobile is about..and that the original vibrant is fully capable of 4g is what makes it impossible to trust this source…
If the 4g version specs are what the leaks say…BOTH samsung AND T-mobile would not release the froyo update because they BOTH benefit from the sales…don’t be naive and think t-mobile would be all righteous about it…i worked for them for 2 years..they have all of us vibrant owners in 2 year contracts.. They don’t need us anymore…they want new customers and holding back a froyo release to raise the value of this theoretical 4g vibrant would be in their interest as well.
We need documentation! If true and prove-able, then would’t this be some sort of collusion? Would that not open them up for litigation? FTC, FCC, SEC, or class-action law firm, anybody out there?
Regarding the OTA update…this is Samsungs’ history. This is not the first time they have done this! When you buy a Samsung phone, don’t expect an update…..root your phone an apply one.
The HSPA don’t bother me that much, but if they are Holding Off the OTA due to the Release of the Phone. Ugh!
I agree. I think its time we all sent Samsung some hate mail.
I’m on Board with ya
already did. Both over chat and email.
The Thing People has to realize, is the Phone Supports HSPA, just not HSPA+. So yeah the 4G Icon is going to work.. Look at the First JP3 build I put out for the Vibrant, we had a fully working H icon when we was on HSPA vs. UMTS that we get now… This might be what he mean, but the hardware does not support HSPA+…
I already did and called up TMO and gave them some hell, but as a bonus they are now giving me a free upgrade worth $200 whenever I want to take it
The HSPA don’t bother me that much, but if they are Holding Off the OTA due to the Release of the Phone. Ugh!
This is just BS. They could have released the 2.2 version without updating drivers to full HSPA, the Vibrant is not capable on full HSDPA but HSPA with a max download thoretical of 7.2 mbps, while the new Vibrant is capable thoretical up to 21 mbps, and actual “4G” phones are being able to push 14.4 mbps on tmo.
That depends because the sprint epic 4g comes with a governor on how fast its 4g can be and the devs have been able to disable it. Who’s to say the vibrant didn’t ship with a similar governor?
Thank god for the android dev community because at the rate these companies make there own handsets obsolete,the devs are the only thing keeping the current devices relevent.I love google,android,and the dev community,but fuck the greedy carriers and hardware manufacturers.
Alright I just want t know the release date of the Vibrant 4G. that way the guys over at xda can port the kernal and the FFC on my original can be finally be fully functional.
FYI….in the beginning, T-mobile ordered the Vibrant without the FFC. Who is to dispute whether or not this was there intentions as well???
No they didn’t get your facts straight. Wasn’t offered. Look at all the other galaxy s phones is us. No other ones have it either.
False. The Epic has it. It WAS offered, so you need to get YOUR facts straight.
In fact, the Epic also has a camera flash.
[...] the 'Samsung doesn't want you to have Froyo' thing … So there's that story going around (first reported at AndroidSpin) from a tipster regarding the Android 2.2 update for the Vibrant, and how Samsung, not T-Mobile, [...]
I just got a Vibrant a month ago, and I’ve been waiting for the 2.2 update. If this turns out to be true then Samsung will have lost a customer. This is simply unacceptable.
right there with you
same here.
Likewise.
Yeah, I don’t think this is acceptable behavior by either company.
Same here, bought TWO of them two montsh ago with the salesman using the froyo upgrade as a way to “sell” me, he promised it would be out BEFORE the end of the year, false advertising?
I said it once! If t mobile does this I’m leaving!
They better release an update be4 the 4g release, they will lose alot of customers
Class Action Aw Suit and US Attry General needs to look at them like they did with MS (IE)….Samsung ‘s CEO needs to leave as the honorable thing.
I want my update dammit!
gotta love htc right about now. they can’t beat xda at rolling out updates, but they sure do beat samsung.
The Update more-less Covers what I posted an hour ago.
that”s effed up!
Its the behold 2 all over again but worse. I’m stuck with crappy T-Mo and that means Samsung, cause they are the only ones putting out decent phones even though they refuse to give updates in a timely fashion.
But both companies would definitely be involved in a hold back, if this is true, which I didnt even need to read this to know. Luckily we have Eugene373, Team whiskey, as well as many others working hard to give us updates and the like. Just wish I wasnt stuck with Samsung or T-Mo. (I still have a couple upgrades left, might have to get the new vibrant, although it kills me to do it.)
how you figure only samsung has good phones? Mytouch 4g, G2? what are those. I like t-mobile just not the crap samsung is doing.
And this my friends is why I will be switching over to the LG,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
i So hope the LG optimus x2 ia coming to t-mobile. im going to get that the first day i can. if possible.
Hey!! My husband sent this over to me this morning – http://blogs.computerworld.com/17649/android_upgrades?source=CTWNLE_nlt_dailyam_2011-01-13
Turns out: HTC, Motorola provide updates and Samsung, LG, Dell do not.
Correct me if I am wrong. But, JL5 does not have work JIT. No speed increase over 2.1, just better stability.
I am running JL5 right now and aside from some tweaks, its the same thing. Also my GPS still doesn’t work. It did under Ji6, but that ended quick enough. I will agree with the others, this is the last Samsung phone I will be buying. I may even pay the ETF and move to sprint.
Wow I am not even surprised.. Not one bit, no one should be
There seems to be credible evidence here that the original Vibrant, at least in theory should support 14.4 : Halfway down the page, it mentions the samsung vibrant using the infineon 5703, which on their site, lists Class 10 as the chip support (14.4 speed)
http://www.ubmtechinsights.com/reports-and-subscriptions/investigative-analysis/samsung-galaxy-s/teardown/
http://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/channel.html?channel=ff80808112ab681d0112ab6ac1120609
Thats it im definetely leaving tmobile for this. Stupid company. The original european galaxy s already supports that, now they really want to screw us over just because the vibrant piece of sh!t sold like hot pancakes, they are trying to make us pay twice as much.
its not t-mobile is samsucks
Its not Tmobile its Samsung you Noob!!!
T-Mobile is (so far) going along with the scheme. They’re in collusion, so both are to blame. T-Mobile has a way out though, they can release the OTA, Samsung sales figures be damned.
Stop waiting and just root people. This is an amazing phone if you get off the stock OS and use what’s out there. As a matter of fact, the roms out there are more advanced than the Froyo update will probably be since most of them dump touchwiz and make the phone lightning fast. As for HSPA+, if it’s that important buy another phone.
I knew since almost a year: you buy an expensive device with an expensive plan and you just hope for the good faith of your maker/carrier. And if the maker is Samsung prepare to be let down. I bought a Galaxy (not S) and I’m still stuck with a firmware with lot of problems and Android 1.6. But I shelved out 400€ and I’m not spending other money on a phone.
[...] is questionable as the hardware needs to support HSDPA+ for this to work, but you never know. Source. __________________ 2.6.36-ARCH DWM 5.8.2 Motorola Droid: CM6.1 @ 1.2GHz Android Battery Guide [...]
As much as this sucks They by no means have to update the Galaxy S at all. Look at all the Android devices that that are still on 1.6 and wont receive an update at all. We can complain and moan all we want but it is not gonna matter in the long run. The companies lawyers would have had something in their contract to protect them in this case. Back to HTC for me
[...] Kiehl / AndroidSPIN: Breaking: T-Mobile internals confirm Samsung is holding the Android world Hostage — We recently received a tip from someone we feel is a reliable source. The [...]
[...] AndroidSpin claims to have an anonymous tipster who is saying that T-mobile has a working version of 2.2 for the Vibrant that also enables a data speed boost but is not being allowed to push it out for fear that it will decrease the value of the Samsung Vibrant 4G. The Vibrant 4G is a Galaxy S phone that will be making its way to T-Mobile here soon, it includes access to T-Mobile’s 4G network, has a front facing camera and a LED flash. The original Vibrant obviously lacks all of these features, but Samsung is definitely looking for high sales figures and wants all customers to look to upgrade as opposed to system updates. [...]
[...] you might have to wait a bit longer (maybe forever) if this rumor is to be believed. According to Androidspin, they have what they feel is a reliable source telling them to hold off on a “fully functioning [...]
Samsung is just cool like that dude.
http://www.being-anon.it.tc
[...] [...]
Hi all I am from Canada. Samsung here is giving Bell a bad name here as well. I have called Samsung and you talk to people that are clueless could care less about costumers. I know if I root I would be better off but it would void my worenty. This is my second i9000m last one had no tv out and lots of problems with 2.2. Now the new one came with 2.2 but it still is having problems wifi, bluetooth, dropped calls, and after I hang up from a call it goes to my lock screen. But my tv out is good. Samsung even hung up on me when I had kies tell me there was an update and had Samsung Canada facebook telling me that there was one. They were telling me there was no update. I read the page told them kies had a popup telling me there was and was passed on to a superviser that still said there was none. I even told them to check the facebook page and they got pissed and hung up. Called back with no info (like my phone# and name and just said hear theres an update thats 3 hours old I hear people are happy. He told me that it came out the day before. I said why did I just get lied to and gave him names and said I even was hung up on. He couldn’t help me why I was having a crepto error. Figured the problem my self. I dont know what they do to the 2.2 code but maybe they should hire darky and the boys. I’ll stay away from Samsung next phone after Ive rooted this one after the worenty. Samsung better smarten up lots of other players coming on to play. My gps is crap my music through bluetooth keeps micro stoping dont happen with earbuds or back speaker but on bluetooth 2 differant stereo headphones. Worked ok on last phone before the 2.2 update. If there is a class action I want in too. The lawyers can keep the cash I just want a phone that works.
i want in on the class action too, t-mobile hung up on me twice…. i want justice, i just paid $523 dollars two days ago and this is the service i get fron t-mobile? never again will i buy a samssung, or even worse theough t-mobile… and belive that next year im going with the big V….
[...] following:Some disturbing things have happened the last week or so concerning our “Vibrant”. Samsung has NOT allowed us to push the update OTA for 2.2 because they feel it will decrease the value of [...]
[...] The folks over at AndroidSpin have received a tip from a very reliable source which says that Samsung is intentionally holding [...]
It’s a corporation. They need to make $$$ for their shareholders (and themselves). They also tend to think short-term. If it f’s up other people (like consumers) do you think they REALLY care?
There’s such a thing as “enlightened self-interest.” Companies that foul their nest like this find customers flock elsewhere.
The amazing thing to me is how Google reps proudly pronounce this as a sign of the health and even near-perfection of the Android philosophy: the networks and manufacturers can do with it whatever they want, and Google’s reputation is not at stake despite the fact that Google is making many of these claims about “free” and “open” that trip up consumers.
[...] being given by Sammy’s Twitter accounts and Customer Service.[Via Android Central and AndroidSpin] If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing [...]
Author: it’s “more than”, not “more then”.
[...] 3G, but what new features might this gadget have that the original Nexus S lacked? HSPA+? Is AndroidSpin’s post about Samsung’s update shenanigans accurate? They wouldn’t release a new Nexus S [...]
[...] [Via Android Central and AndroidSpin] [...]
[...] Kiehl / AndroidSPIN:Breaking: T-Mobile internals confirm Samsung іѕ holding tһе Android world Hostag… — Wе recently received a tip frοm someone wе feel іѕ a [...]
[...] [...]
Just got off the phone after speaking with several T-Mobile representatives. The first person was probably the most honest who told me that release of 2.2 for the Vibrant might not happen because of the release to the new 4G phone. Could not see why I could have an issue with T-Mobile over a statement like that. Lucky for me I confirmed that I was off contract (beginning today) for the two phones I have with T-Mobile. Customer retention told me that it would be a shame for me to leave T-Mobile after so many years with them over the issue of a software release. The issue is lack of integrity on the part of T-Mobile. Shame on T-Mobile – they are in bed with Samsung and pretending that they have no say regarding release of 2.2 for loyal customers who bought the original Vibrant.
I actually had a feeling something like this was going on. I hate SAMSUNG so much.
[...] what is being described as a hostage situation at AndroidSPIN, a tipster has informed the blog that Samsung is withholding the already finalized Android 2.2 [...]
Is there some kind of lawsuit brewing here. When I bought my vibrant I was told it was getting froyo. This is false advertisment.
Do I smell a lawsuit coming on. I think so.
Do I smell a lawsuit coming on. I think so.
[...] to AndroidSpin, they received a tip from a reliable source that claims that Samsung is preventing T-Mobile from [...]
[...] referring, of course, to Samsung and T-Mobile's shenanigans of late. Yesterday, Androidspy broke a rumor from "a reliable source" that accused the two companies of withholding an otherwise-ready Froyo [...]
[...] Plus, there are apparently some shady things going on at Samsung coming to light. According to AndroidSpin, a T-Mobile insider is making a few lofty [...]
[...] was I wrong. Was I wrong in every single way. Go read this article over at Android Spin, then come back and find out why I am spitting mad, what we call on AGTN ”Nilay [...]
[...] both for themselves and their shareholders. Thus, this shouldn't come as a surprise. A tipster has come forward and said that Samsung is holding back the Android 2.2 (Froyo) update from the T-Mobile Vibrant [...]
[...] had received from an anonymous source claiming to work internally at T-Mobile. As we stated in our previous post although we cannot validate nor deny the alleged rumor, we felt it was necessary to bring it to the [...]
[...] trailed in a distant second at 15.4 percent. Samsung fared worse at 11.1 percent, or one device. Reports, and even a potential class-action lawsuit, suggest that Samsung may be holding back the Android [...]
[...] rumor is about as shaky as they come, but Android Spin is accusing Samsung of deliberately withholding the Android 2.2 upgrade from T-Mobile’s Vibrant just to drum up [...]
[...] rumor is about as shaky as they come, but Android Spin is accusing Samsung of deliberately withholding the Android 2.2 upgrade from T-Mobile’s Vibrant just to drum up [...]
If this is the case that Samsung is holding it back from release, I will take this personally. I ve been waiting for th fryo update for months. I will not buy anymore Samsung products in my case. If I have a choice between similar products and Samsung happens to be one of them, I will choose another one over Samsung because of the way Samsung is treating its galaxy vibrant buyers. I will put my 200 plus dollars in another brand…my two cents.
[...] trailed in a distant second at 15.4 percent. Samsung fared worse at 11.1 percent, or one device. Reports, and even a potential class-action lawsuit, suggest that Samsung may be holding back the Android [...]
[...] Dell etwa dem US-Mobilfunkanbieter AT&T vorwirft. Auf der anderen Seite kamen aber auch schon unbewiesene Vorwürfe eines angeblichen Mitarbeiters von T-Mobile USA auf, Samsung verzögere bereits verfügbare [...]
[...] Android Spin for letting us know about the possibility of Samsung deliberately pushing back the Samsung Vibrant Android 2.2 update. Related Posts :New Call of Duty: Black Ops PC Patch to Impro… HTC Evo 4G Gets A [...]
this is bulls#@$ i feel that samsung its not fair with the vibrant buyers that was hoping for this update from day one, lie after lie about the release of the 2.2 update, and now the unveiling of these news, I feel that my next phone going to be a iphone on verizon… I feel dissapointed by t-mobile and samsung..
[...] delayed due to further testing. Then, just 4 days ago, AndroidSPIN reported that the Vibrant update (if not others) [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] No. It’s due to the OEMs and carriers who are holding these updates up for different reasons. Here’s a perfect example. SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "90% Chance You’re On The Latest OS. Android User? 0.4% Chance", [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] charging carriers too much for the upgrade. Another rumored reason came from Allen Kiehl over on Android Spin who spoke of a tipster who told them that an Android 2.2 update was sitting ready to go out to [...]
[...] AndroidSpin first reported 12 January that Samsung was intentionally not updating the Vibrant’s operating system to Android 2.2 – as customers had been promised – for fear that an update would decrease interest in the upcoming Vibrant 4G, a 4G-enabled version of the device that (should some leaked promotional materials prove true) could become the fastest device on the T-Mobile network. [...]
[...] like the model, citing the hardware and software compatibility issues, such as Samsung’s alleged holding back of the Android 2.2 upgrade on its Galaxy S [...]
Just updated my Galaxy S Captivate yesterday. I have no beefs with Samsung….then again I am in Canada.
you got 2.2?
so how is it done
[...] was cagey about the Froyo delays. Tensions boiled over Jan. 12 when AndroidSpin cited an alleged T-Mobile source who claimed Samsung was withholding the Froyo [...]
[...] was cagey about the Froyo delays. Tensions boiled over Jan. 12 when AndroidSpin cited an alleged T-Mobile source who claimed Samsung was withholding the Froyo [...]
[...] was cagey about the Froyo delays. Tensions boiled over Jan. 12 when AndroidSpin cited an alleged T-Mobile source who claimed Samsung was withholding the Froyo [...]
[...] was cagey about the Froyo delays. Tensions boiled over Jan. 12 when AndroidSpin cited an alleged T-Mobile source who claimed Samsung was withholding the Froyo [...]
Even though I already have 2.2 on my vibrant through a few websites i have found … im officially done buying anything from samsung ever again….to promise their buyers froyo 2.2 and then taking it back to make a buck is just wrong ….ill never buy another cell phone from samsung as long as I live…and will make sure i get the news out there ..how samsung screws their customers…….
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]
[...] was cagey about the Froyo delays. Tensions boiled over Jan. 12 when AndroidSpin cited an alleged T-Mobile source who claimed Samsung was withholding the Froyo [...]
[...] limitations for this (as with the iOS updates) or simply the carriers not being bothered. From some reports, it seems that the carriers are loathe to push out functional updates as they detract away from new [...]
[...] these updates up for a wide variety of reasons, 99 percent of which are undoubtedly bullshit. Here’s a perfect example. Supposedly, the Android 2.2 update is all ready to go for Samsung Android phones on T-Mobile, but [...]